next up previous
Next: The flow-invariant subspaces of Up: Heteroclinic cycles in symmetrically Previous: Introduction

Local & global aspects of symmetric dynamics

Let $\Gamma$ be a compact Lie group and suppose that $\Gamma$ acts on the finite dimensional real vector space V as a group of real linear transformations. In the sequel we refer to $(V,\Gamma)$, or just V, as a (group) representation.

Remark 2.1   Every closed subgroup $\Gamma$ of the orthogonal group O(n) defines an `orthogonal' representation $(\mbox{$\mathbb{R} $ }^n,\Gamma)$. Conversely, every representation is isomorphic to an orthogonal representation. $\diamondsuit$

Our interest lies in differential equations or vector fields which are defined on V and which are symmetric relative to the given $\Gamma$-action. Thus if

 
x' = X(x) (1)

is a smooth vector field on V, we say that X is $\Gamma$-equivariant if

\begin{displaymath}X(\gamma x) = \gamma X(x),\;\;(x \in V, \gamma \in \Gamma).
\end{displaymath}

The assumption of equivariance implies strong restrictions on the phase portrait of ([*]). For example, it follows from the uniqueness of solutions of ordinary differential equations that if $\phi: (a,b) \mbox{$\rightarrow$ }V$ is an integral curve of ([*]), then so is $\gamma \circ \phi$, all $\gamma \in \Gamma$. (Thus $\Gamma$ acts on the phase portrait by permuting maximal integral curves.)

The assumption that the group $\Gamma$ acts on V, implies that not all points in V are `equal': some are more symmetric than others. We quantify this idea of symmetry of a point by defining the isotropy group of the action at a point of V. Specifically, if $x \in V$, we define the isotropy group $\Gamma_x$ at x by

\begin{displaymath}\Gamma_x =\{\gamma \in V \mbox{$\;\vert\;$ }\gamma x = x\}.
\end{displaymath}

The isotropy group $\Gamma_x$ is always a closed (therefore Lie) subgroup of $\Gamma$. We think of $\Gamma_x$ as measuring the symmetry of the point x (with respect to the given action of $\Gamma$). Viewed in this way, the origin always has maximal symmetry since $\Gamma_0 = \Gamma$. We say that a point $x \in V$ has trivial symmetry if $\Gamma_x$ consists only of the identity element of $\Gamma$. It turns out that for `most' representations $(V,\Gamma)$, an open and dense set of points will have only the trivial symmetry. Thus, for a point to have nontrivial symmetry is exceptional rather than the norm.

Example 2.2  
  
Figure: Isotropy for action by D4
\begin{figure}\centerline{%
\psfig{figure=d4.eps,height=2.5in,width=2.5in}}
\end{figure}

In Figure [*], we show the symmetries of points in the plane for the standard action of the dihedral group D4. The group D4 consists of reflections in the lines $p,q,\ell, m$ together with the cyclic group $\mbox{$\mathbb{Z} $ }_4$ generated by rotation through $\pi/2$. Nonzero points on the lines $p,q,\ell, m$ all have isotropy group isomorphic to $\mbox{$\mathbb{Z} $ }_2$. All other nonzero points in the plane have trivial isotropy. $\heartsuit$

Using equivariance, together with the smooth dependence of integral curves on initial conditions, it is easy to see that isotropy groups are constant along maximal integral curves of ([*]). This apparently innocuous observation about isotropy along integral curves has the significant and surprising consequence that V contains subsets which are flow-invariant for all equivariant vector fields.

Example 2.3   Suppose that X is a smooth D4-equivariant vector field defined on $\mbox{$\mathbb{R} $ }^2$, where we take the action of D4 given in Example [*]. Let Abe the open wedge shaped region shown in Figure [*] and suppose that $x_0 \in A$. Let C be the maximal integral curve through x0. Since x0 has trivial isotropy, all points of C must have trivial isotropy. It follows that C is a subset of A, for otherwise Cwould have to contain points on one of the lines m, q. Hence A is a flow-invariant subset of $\mbox{$\mathbb{R} $ }^2$ for all D4-equivariant vector fields on $\mbox{$\mathbb{R} $ }^2$. Similar arguments show that the lines $p,q,\ell, m$ and the origin are also flow-invariant subspaces. $\heartsuit$



 
next up previous
Next: The flow-invariant subspaces of Up: Heteroclinic cycles in symmetrically Previous: Introduction
Mike Field
1998-10-01